您好,欢迎光临武汉赛培生物科技有限公司! 本公司产品仅供科研实验研究使用,不用于临床诊断! 客服中心 全国服务热线: 18086415513

赛培新增产品文献:人MIP-1α,MCP -1,IL-1β,IL-8 ELISA试剂盒
发布时间:2022-04-08 11:03:29

奥马珠单抗联合布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂 治疗中重度过敏性哮喘患儿的临床研究 

Clinical trial of omazumab combined with budesonide and formoterol powder inhalation in the treatment of children with moderate and severe allergic asthma

摘要: 目的 观察奥马珠单抗联合布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂治疗中重度过敏 性哮喘患儿的临床疗效及安全性方法 133 例中重度过敏性哮喘患儿随 机分为对照组 67 例和试验组 66 对照组给予布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂吸 入治疗每次 164. 5 μgbid12 周后改为每次 164. 5 μgqd维持至 16 ; 试验组 在对照组治疗的基础上给予奥马珠单抗每次 150 ~ 600 mg2 次给药时间间隔 2 周或 4 皮下注射治疗 16 比较 2 组患儿的临床疗效儿童哮喘控制测试 ( C - ACT) 评分肺功能以及药物不良反应的发生情况结果 试验过程中脱 3 治疗后试验组和对照组的总有效率分别为 92. 31% ( 60 /65 ) 78. 46% ( 51 /65 ) ,差异有统计学意义( P < 0. 05) 治疗后试验组和对照 组的 C - ACT 评分分别为( 23. 41 ± 1. 06) ( 20. 02 ± 1. 23) 1 秒用力呼气 量占预计值百分比分别为( 98. 77 ± 29. 19) % ( 86. 94 ± 27. 32) % 用力肺活量 占预计值百分比别为( 88. 95 ± 9. 49) % ( 83. 08 ± 7. 68) % 最大呼气流量占预 计值百分比分别为( 93. 42 ± 30. 14) % ( 81. 33 ± 26. 68) % 差异均有统计学意 ( P < 0. 05) 试验组的药物不良反应主要有头痛咽部刺激症状发热和上 腹痛对照组的药物不良反应主要有头痛和咽部刺激症状试验组和对照组的 总药 物 不 良 反 应 发 生率分别为 9. 23% 6. 15% 差异无统计学意义 ( P > 0. 05) 结论 奥马珠单抗治疗中重度过敏性哮喘患儿的临床疗效较好可有效控制哮喘改善肺功能且安全性好关键词: 奥马珠单抗; 布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂; 过敏性哮喘; 儿童; 安全性 评价 DOI: 10. 13699 /j. cnki. 1001 - 6821. 2021. 19. 008 中图分类号: R974. 3 文献标志码: A 文章编号: 1001 - 6821( 2021) 19 - 2577 - 04 Abstract: Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of omalizumab combined with budesonide formoterol powder inhalation in the treatment of children with moderate and severe allergic asthma. Methods A total of 133 children with moderate and severe allergic asthma were randomly divided into control group ( n = 67 cases) and treatment group ( n = 66 cases) . The control group was given budesonide formoterol powder inhalation 164. 5 μg per timetwice a dayafter treatment 12 weeksthe dose was changed to 164. 5 μg per timeonce a dayand maintained until 16 weeks. The treatment group was given omalizumab 150 - 600 mg per timethe interval between the two administrations was 2 or 4 weekssubcutaneous injection for 16 weekson the basis of control group. The clinical efficacythe childhood asthma2578 中国临床药理学杂志 37 卷 第 19 2021 10 ( 总第 345 ) control test ( C - ACT) scoreslung function and adverse drug reactions were compard between two groups. Results There were 3 cases of shedding during the trial. After treatmentthe total effective rates of treatment and control groups were 92. 31% ( 60 cases / 65 cases) and 78. 46% ( 51 cases / 65 cases) with significant difference ( P < 0. 05) . After treatmentthe C - ACT scores of treatment and control groups were ( 23. 41 ± 1. 06) and ( 20. 02 ± 1. 23) pointsforced expiratory volume in one second / percentage of predicted values were ( 98. 77 ± 29. 19 ) % and ( 86. 94 ± 27. 32 ) % forced vital capacity / percentage of predicted values were ( 88. 95 ± 9. 49 ) % and ( 83. 08 ± 7. 68 ) % peak expiratory flow / percentage of predicted values were ( 93. 42 ± 30. 14 ) % and ( 81. 33 ± 26. 68) % the differences were statistically significant ( all P < 0. 05 ) . The adverse drug reactions of treatment group were headachepharyngeal irritationfever and upper abdominal painwhile those in control group were headache and pharyngeal irritation. The total incidences of adverse drug reactions in treatment and control group were 9. 23% and 6. 15% without significant difference ( P > 0. 05) . Conclusion Omalizumab has a good clinical efficacy in the treatment of children with moderate to severe allergic asthmacan effectively control asthmaimprove lung functionand the safety was good. Key words: omalizumab; budesonide formoterol powder inhalation; allergic asthma; children; safety evaluation


奥马珠单抗联合布地奈德福莫特罗粉吸入剂治疗中、重度过敏性哮喘患儿的临床研究.pdf


服务热线:

027-87639600

18086415513